Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 June 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
Language is everything when it comes to drafting legislation, otherwise the Government would not be too worried about words such as ““may””, ““shall””, ““would””, ““either”” and ““or””. The use of words is important, and my concern is that the way in which the Government are putting forward these measures against the background of the rest of this part of the Bill reflects a steady ratcheting of power towards the centre. It is against that background that I find myself uncomfortable with this part of the Bill, which is why I supported the amendment. That is why I know that we shall return to matters such as this at other stages of the Bill. It is important that we debate the whole range of issues in which the Government are inexorably moving the barriers so that the Secretary of State gains more power.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 683 c732
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Costs Association of Chief Police Officers Finance Police Powers Public appointments Mergers Police authorities Standards Association of Police Authorities
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:24:21 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331256
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331256
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331256