Proceeding contribution from Lord Palmer (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
My Lords, I am, naturally, extremely disappointed. After the noble Baroness, Lady Royall, and I had conversed in the Corridor about this, I thought that the amendment would meet with a certain amount of government acceptance. I shall read very carefully exactly what the Minister said. With the greatest possible respect, I think there was rather a lot of civil servant jargon in his reply and it was rather difficult to understand exactly what he was trying to get at. Before I withdraw the amendment, perhaps I may ask the Minister whether he will be kind enough to spare me 10 minutes in his office before we come to Third Reading because I should like to explore this matter in a little more depth.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 683 c1057
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Costs Delegated legislation Disqualification Health hazards Drugs Health professions Health insurance Labelling Licensed premises NHS Patients Qualifications Powers of entry Personal records Public appointments Public places Pharmacy Ophthalmic services Prices Prescriptions Standards Safety Tax allowances Technology Smoking
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 21:42:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_332556
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_332556
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_332556