Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Monson (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.


Health Bill

My Lords, I am grateful to all the noble Lords who have contributed to this short debate. I shall take the Minister up on one point. He said that a significant number of regulations in the Bill will be subject to the affirmative procedure. Actually, they all will, with the exception of this one. As I said earlier, if this amendment is agreed to it will be correcting an anomaly. I am sorry the Government have not budged. They have not budged very much at all in our proceedings on this Bill. There have been a couple of minor concessions, but nothing to write home about. It is not just because I have had a nightmare journey getting here due to the King’s Cross fire, but because I am convinced that this amendment, if it is passed, has the potential to benefit to a significant degree a large number of perfectly respectable, law-abiding people who will otherwise lose out, that I wish to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 46) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 41; Not-Contents, 143. Schedule 8 [Minor and consequential amendments]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c1062 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Costs Delegated legislation Disqualification Health hazards Drugs Health professions Health insurance Labelling Licensed premises NHS Patients Qualifications Powers of entry Personal records Public appointments Public places Pharmacy Ophthalmic services Prices Prescriptions Standards Safety Tax allowances Technology Smoking
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk