Proceeding contribution from Bridget Prentice (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 5 July 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Sutton Magistrates Court.
Sutton Magistrates Court
I do not want to commit my right hon. and learned Friend to meetings without having a word with her, but I will certainly put it to her. She is generally very open to meetings with colleagues and, if her diary permits, I am sure that she will allow that. On strategy, there is not a bottomless pot of money. The Courts Service must demonstrate that it is efficient and effective in its use of public funds, including its estate. The hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington asked whether the local authority could appeal under the system. Local authorities no longer make a financial contribution to the courts and I will have to write to the hon. Gentleman about whether the local authority can definitely not appeal against closure. At the moment, of course, there is no closure, but I will ensure that that point is clarified. If at a future date the agency concludes that any of its courthouses should close, that could only follow rigorous evaluation of the benefits of doing so, including full consultation with local communities and key stakeholders who may be affected. Obviously, Members of Parliament are key to that.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 448 c279-80WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Closures Magistrates' courts Sutton Greater London Magistrates' Courts Authority
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 23:25:15 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_334957
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_334957
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_334957