Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 4 July 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pensions Appeal Tribunals (Armed Forces and Reserve Forces Compensation Scheme) (Rights of Appeal) Amendment Regulations 2006.


Pensions Appeal Tribunals (Armed Forces and Reserve Forces Compensation Scheme) (Rights of Appeal) Amendment Regulations 2006

I thank the Minister for explaining the regulations. They are essentially a tidying-up exercise and should have been dealt with at the time of the original legislation. It makes me worry how much secondary legislation we will receive after the Armed Forces Bill becomes an Act. My honourable friend Mark Harper raised our concerns over the compensation tariff for mental health, as opposed to physical injury, in some detail in the other place. I will not raise them again this afternoon but, other than those concerns, the regulations appear not to be controversial and to make perfect sense.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c34GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disability Compensation Appeals Armed forces Death Workplace pensions Pensions Tribunals Reserve forces War pensions Pensions Appeal Tribunal Armed forces compensation scheme Veterans
Legislation
Pensions Appeal Tribunals (Additional Rights of Appeal) (Amendment) Regulations 2006
Pensions Appeal Tribunals (Armed Forces and Reserve Forces Compensation Scheme) (Rights of Appeal) Amendment Regulations 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk