Proceeding contribution from Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 12 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.
Education and Inspections Bill
I take issue with the Minister about Amendment No. 92 which, as far as we are concerned, merely requires that there should be a larger proportion of elected parent-governors on trust school bodies. We find it very odd that the trust school model diminishes the role of elected parent-governors. I cannot see that that would prevent a foundation being set up. But we will come to that in due course; we are certainly not going to withdraw that amendment now. However, as for Amendment No. 56, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendments Nos. 57 and 57A not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c818
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Disability Community schools Leisure Education Governing bodies Inspections Foundation schools Finland Local government Pupils Personal, social, health and economic education Standards Teachers Training Sports Sixth form education Trust schools Relationships and sex education
- Legislation
- Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:55:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336870
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336870
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_336870