Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Oliver Heald (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 17 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Compensation Bill (HL).


Compensation Bill [Lords]

The hon. Gentleman will correct me if I am wrong, but it will take the courts many a long year to work out what ““lodging”” means. Does he accept that a range of issues relating to time limitation will be raised? [Interruption.] I hear the Cambridge law faculty agreeing. If ““lodging”” is the triggering factor, it seems to me that there will be plenty of work for those whom the hon. Gentleman knows well. I agree with the Minister that the hon. Gentleman’s new clause would be a fundamental change to the legal framework and principles of common law, with wider ramifications. Those are the main points about the first group of amendments. We will certainly support the Minister on new clause 13.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
449 c55 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Codes of practice Courts Damages Advertising Coal Asbestos Legal profession Employment Liability Exemptions Functions Mining Negligence Mesothelioma Standards Regulation Trade unions Victims Industrial injuries disablement benefit Claims management services Mesothelioma Compensation Board
Legislation
Compensation Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk