Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 18 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

I am grateful to the Minister for that and for his reassurances on quite a number of the issues that I raised. I am particularly pleased to have received clarification of the merger of the infant and the junior schools, because it is good that schools know that they do not have to go through a lengthy competition in those circumstances. I have one more question to ask the Minister. My Amendment No. 90 was a purely probing amendment. The noble Baroness, Lady Buscombe, seemed to take it at face value, but it was intended simply to be probing, because it was not totally clear whether physical alterations were included. Am I right that Clause 18(2) means that if a community school submits a proposal to expand its sixth form, any such alteration must involve ““one ... of the following”” alterations in paragraphs (a), (b) or (c)? That would imply that it has to become a foundation school.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c1178 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Admissions Community development Ballots Closures Community schools City technology colleges Education Further education Inspections Faith schools Foundation schools Local government Parents Pupils Mergers Minority groups Standards Schools Special educational needs School choice Religion Academies Trust schools
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk