Proceeding contribution from Nick Ainger (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Government of Wales Bill.
Government of Wales Bill
Let me continue with my argument. Such a provision would never be used retrospectively to amend a court order, although it could be used, depending on the circumstances, to deal with the results flowing from a court’s decision. I hope that that deals with the hon. Gentleman’s point. The Government do not envisage the power to make retrospective provision being exercised except in very rare cases. While I understand the thrust of the amendments, there are sound reasons why the Government cannot accept them. There could be public interest considerations in favour of making retrospective provision. It is not right that the Government should be prevented from taking the public interest into account in making legislation. Furthermore, the amendments are technically defective and would render the provisions that relate to retrospective provisions inoperable.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 449 c218-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Candidates Devolution Elections Legislative competence Legislation National Assembly for Wales Referendums Politics and government Proportional representation Wales Welsh Government
- Legislation
- Government of Wales Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-21 13:32:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338876
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338876
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338876