Proceeding contribution from Earl Ferrers (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 24 July 2006. It occurred during Legislative debate on Parliamentary Costs Bill [HL].
Parliamentary Costs Bill [HL]
My Lords, I asked the noble and learned Lord this question once before and got a pretty dusty answer. I expect that I shall get a dusty one today, too. When he has Motions down on the Order Paper, they appear under the name of the Lord Falconer of Thoroton, but it has always been the practice to put them down under the name of the Lord Chancellor, which is a very glorious name. The report that we have just been discussing refers to the noble and learned Lord as the Lord Chancellor. The Lord Chancellor happens to occupy a very special place. The noble and learned Lord is not just any old noble and learned Lord—he is the Lord Chancellor. His name ought to appear on the Order Paper and not the name of the Lord Falconer of Thoroton. I do not expect the noble and learned Lord to give me an answer on this today, but perhaps he will be good enough to think about it and put the name of the Lord Chancellor down in future cases.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c1550
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Legislation
- Parliamentary Costs Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:28:03 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340598
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340598
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340598