Proceeding contribution from Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 9 October 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Prison Estate.
Prison Estate
The answer to the hon. Gentleman’s second question is Dover, but if he knows of any other barracks, institutions or premises that might be suitable and available, I will of course look at them as well. Many of the recommendations in the report that the hon. Gentleman mentioned have in fact been implemented. We commit people to community service where that is appropriate. However, the public will be more likely to accept a sentencing regime—including community service—if they know that it has not been dictated by a shortage of prison places. In other words, they want to be reassured that those who deserve to be kept in prison for longer periods are being so detained, rather than illegitimately being given a non-custodial sentence for the wrong reasons. I understand that feeling, which is why I want to ensure that dangerous offenders are kept away from the public if their offence merits that. On that basis, we can then argue that community service and other non-custodial sentences—many of which are referred to in the report—are appropriate, and they will gain public acceptance.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c44
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Foreign nationals Prisoners Prisons Sentencing Detention centres
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:45:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350102
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350102
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_350102