---

Parliamentary Costs Bill [HL]

My Lords, I wonder whether I could ask the noble and learned Lord a question; it is one that I have asked him once before and he said he would be kind enough to consider it. In the good old days, as one might call them, any business tabled in the name of the then Lord Chancellor was always put down under ““The Lord Chancellor””. Were that still to apply, this Motion would be under the name of the Lord Chancellor. In fact, it is under the name of the noble and learned Lord, Lord Falconer of Thoroton. That is a great name, but the name ““The Lord Chancellor”” is an even better one. I wonder why it is that these things have slipped. When I raised the issue before, the noble and learned Lord said that he would consider it. I suppose he probably gave it 30 seconds of his consideration because obviously it has not made much difference. Would he be kind enough to say that he did consider it and that, owing to an oversight, it has been put down in the name ““Lord Falconer of Thoroton”” when it should be in the name of the Lord Chancellor?