Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Falconer of Thoroton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Parliamentary Costs Bill [HL].


Parliamentary Costs Bill [HL]

My Lords, I did consider it, and indeed the noble Earl wrote me a letter to which I have had the discourtesy not to reply. But because he raised the issue once before and because he wrote the letter, I have given it immense thought. I considered whether the Motion should be in name of the Lord Chancellor, and concluded that it should. It is a Law Commission-inspired Bill and it is something that I do as Lord Chancellor. Therefore, ever after—as a result of the noble Earl’s questions and unreplied correspondence, and subject of course to the Table—such Motions will be in the name of the Lord Chancellor. I apologise that it was not done before.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c258 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Costs Private bills
Legislation
Parliamentary Costs Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk