Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.


Violent Crime Reduction Bill

moved AmendmentNo. 4: Page 3, line 29, leave out ““16”” and insert ““18”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, I apologise to your Lordships for rising to my feet so much on this matter. We are concerned that applications can be made for individuals who are aged 16 or over. Ever since 1933, the courts have drawn a distinction between adults and juveniles under the age of 18—at first it was under the age of 17 but that age has been raised. It is regrettable that again a route to a criminal conviction is opened up to juveniles in this age group. I will no doubt be unable to convince the Government of that, but I put it forward again as a matter of principle. Although I appreciate that, unfortunately, a lot of binge drinking is done by young people in that age bracket, I do not think that drinking banning orders leading to conviction are the proper way of dealing with their problems. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c543-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Fees and charges Homelessness Licensed premises Drunkenness Local government Public places Sales Young people Shops Drinking banning orders Alcohol disorder zones Boots
Legislation
Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk