Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill (HL).
Companies Bill [Lords]
My right hon. Friend makes an important point. It can be argued that the law would not be expanded. However, companies have told us that dealing with it on a daily basis will involve going through more red tape, setting out the steps that they take when reaching decisions in a way that has not previously been thought to be necessary. They regard that as otiose. Indeed, the Minister and I attended a conference in the City at which a counsel for a very large public company made exactly that point. Companies are concerned by the proposal.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c768-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Charities Company law Companies Directors Age Business Conflict of interests Fraud Functions Ethics Membership Loans Registration Shareholders
- Legislation
- Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:59:25 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352723
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352723
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352723