Proceeding contribution from Jonathan Djanogly (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 17 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill (HL).
Companies Bill [Lords]
In the puerile terms of the Minister’s question, the answer is no. Do we have sympathy with the concept of enlightened shareholder value in its most amorphous terms? Yes, we do. Of course, we do not accept the clause as drafted, because I have just proposed half a dozen amendments to it. We think that it can be improved. Are we suggesting that the clause should be taken out of the Bill? No. The clause should stay in the Bill, but needs significant amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c769
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Charities Company law Companies Directors Age Business Conflict of interests Fraud Functions Ethics Membership Loans Registration Shareholders
- Legislation
- Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:16:02 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352731
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352731
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_352731