Proceeding contribution from Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 26 October 2006. It occurred during Business statement on Business of the House.
Business of the House
Yesterday, the Law Commission produced a report recommending a two-track approach to post-legislative scrutiny. The report arose because of concerns about the quality and quantity of recent legislation. The first stage proposed is a review by the Department that promoted the legislation and the second is the formation of a Joint Committee with powers to take evidence and produce a report. There has seldom been a poorer piece of legislation than the Hunting Act 2004 because of its dire consequences for animal welfare— Does the Leader of the House think that that Act would be a good pilot for such scrutiny, and when will the Government put in place structures to allow hon. Members to take part in the process?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c1691
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Legislative drafting Parliamentary scrutiny
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 16:27:32 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355509
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355509
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355509