Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 25 October 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Victims and Survivors (Northern Ireland) Order 2006.


Victims and Survivors (Northern Ireland) (Order) 2006

I got that in a nutshell. We bring this forward but we do not bring it all forward because we want to have a commissioner appointed in a public and transparent way, with the help of the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The agreement of the commissioner on a work plan is not something that can be imposed. If I came forward with a work plan, first I would be accused by people saying, ““Well, you don’t expect the Northern Ireland Executive to be back, for a start””. We do—it is their duty to be back. Secondly, we would have pre-empted the appointment of the commissioner. I am not saying that no thought has been given to those issues. We have got to the stage in the process of bringing the order forward to put the victims commissioner on a statutory basis. The order is a case of what you see is what you get. We would prefer it to be operated and implemented by the Northern Ireland Assembly—that is our choice. But the absence of the Northern Ireland Assembly is not an excuse for introducing the legislation. That mantra will be repeated later this afternoon, because that is the way of the world. The reform process carries on. We want the Assembly to take it over but, if it does not, we will still carry on. On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
685 c11GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Crimes of violence Advisory services Counselling Finance Functions Grants Northern Ireland Powers Public appointments Victims Northern Ireland Commissioner for Victims and Survivors
Legislation
Victims and Survivors (Northern Ireland) Order 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk