Proceeding contribution from Adrian Bailey (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 December 2006. It occurred during Estimates day on Occupational Pensions.
Occupational Pensions
Earlier, my hon. Friend said that there was a moderate response from the ombudsman about the financial implications. Reference was made to not writing a blank cheque. However, the report also says that"““the Government should consider whether it should make arrangements for the restoration of the core pension and non-core benefits””." It seems that there is confusion about what the ombudsman recommended and the Select Committee recommended. What is being denied is the accurate figure that the Government say is the implication of what is being recommended. My hon. Friend is not bringing that point out adequately.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 454 c520
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Workplace pensions Pensions Ombudsman Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration Health Service Commissioner
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-11-24 10:07:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364211
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364211
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364211