Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from James Purnell (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 7 December 2006. It occurred during Estimates day on Occupational Pensions.


Occupational Pensions

That has not been established. I said—this continues to be the situation—that the representatives have not made the case that the matter fits into the normal precedent whereby the Government would waive costs. We have said not that we will enforce costs, but that we will consider them, as we always do, at the end of the case. We have tried to respond to the Public Administration Committee’s report as constructively as possible. We are implementing several of its recommendations. For example, there will now be a two-year wind-up. We have also made it clear that survivors will be paid and that people can be paid from the age of 65. It is true that the support that we have put in place continues to be less than what it asked for. It is worth saying that the scheme has been extended to 40,000 people since the ombudsman first published her report. We took that report into account when we made the extension, and I think that the House has welcomed our action.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
454 c544 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Workplace pensions Pensions Ombudsman Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration Health Service Commissioner
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk