Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.


Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill

With regard to the list in Schedule 1, perhaps with the exception of the Prison Service and where local authorities are responsible for children or young people but where one can see that deaths have occurred and might properly come within this provision, it is not immediately apparent where some of these public bodies would ever be likely to be guilty of corporate manslaughter, even if they were incorporated. Defra, for example, is one of the bodies listed. I was racking my brains to think of circumstances when its officials or those employed by the department might negligently handle equipment and so on, give rise to deaths and thus—at least, in theory—render Defra liable. Can the Minister explain one or two of the thoughts of principle—that is what I was hoping to tease out from him earlier—which justify the restriction of these bodies’ liability only to their position as employers or as occupiers of land? Should they handle activities badly and kill someone, what principle would cause them to be exempt?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
688 c122GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Accountability Armed forces Death Companies Crown immunity Corporate manslaughter Liability Health and safety Exemptions Government departments Police Prosecutions Management Public bodies Negligence
Legislation
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk