Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill.


Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill

My hon. Friend knows that I agree with him on this issue, but is not there another important distinction to be made in the context of this new clause? By introducing the phrase ““in the interests of justice””, we move away from the position that the Solicitor-General approached in Committee—without quite reaching, although he came perilously close—of saying that one of his prime objectives was conviction, not justice. If it comes to a choice between the interests of justice or of conviction, I know where my sympathies lie and, I suspect, those of the hon. and learned Member for Medway (Mr. Marshall-Andrews).


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
455 c1581 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Criminal proceedings Fraud Juries Jubilee line Judgements Prosecutions Trials
Legislation
Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk