Proceeding contribution from Robert Marshall-Andrews (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill.
Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill
It would be helpful if my hon. and learned Friend would deal with PII. It causes great concern. How can it possibly be brought within the European convention that a judge sitting as judge of fact and law hears matter from the prosecution to which the defence is not privy and thereafter becomes a judge of fact? I am trying to be helpful, but I would have thought that a case in those circumstances would not stand a prayer within the European Court.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 455 c1636
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal proceedings Fraud Juries Jubilee line Judgements Prosecutions Trials
- Legislation
- Fraud (Trials without a Jury) Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:29:37 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_373263
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_373263
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_373263