Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 January 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report.


Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report

My Lords, I am grateful to the right reverend Prelate, although he re-introduces the issue of the Dome, on which I was slightly dismissive in my response to the noble Lord, LordSt John of Fawsley, for which I apologise. The right reverend Prelate will take some joy from the fact that one of the features of the Greenwich application, on which the panel commented, is that there is a great deal of redevelopment in the Greenwich area at the moment, to the great benefit of the locality. The panel sees that position being enhanced. The casino would not have added sufficient value to that development. As he will know, there are several proposals for the development of the Dome within that framework, many of which have exciting aspects. A great many of London’s facilities will be enhanced in preparation for the Olympic Games in 2012, and we anticipate that the Dome will be utilised then. The right reverend Prelate says that he feels slightly sorry for the city of Manchester, which will be subject to the pilot study. That is not the view of Manchester or its people, who are delighted with the outcome of today’s deliberations.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c173 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Location Regulation Casino Advisory Panel
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk