Proceeding contribution from Baroness Golding (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 January 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report.
Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report
My Lords, it is very nice to hear people congratulating Professor Crow and his committee. However, I do not congratulate him on the regional casino: it should not be in Manchester. I spent a very long time on the pre-legislative Select Committee looking at different areas and all the things that I assumed Professor Crow was looking at. Blackpool would be a resort casino; the Dome would be a destination casino; and Manchester would be a city casino. The Select Committee said that the casino should not be in a city. I went to Australia and saw the damage caused by having a casino in a city. The Minister mentioned regeneration aroundthe Dome. What regeneration has there been in Blackpool? The answer is none. What has there been in Manchester? There has been a lot. Blackpool needed this: it was waiting for it and will need it still. Why do we hand over to an academic committee something that should be decided by this House and the elected Members in another place? Can the Minister answer that?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 689 c174
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Location Regulation Casino Advisory Panel
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:50:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_374504
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_374504
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_374504