Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 January 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report.


Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report

My Lords, I assure the Minister that I have never been prouder that I took the title Lord McNally of Blackpool, especially with the town’s dignified and resilient response to today’s news. The Minister mentioned Professor Crow’s report. As the noble Baroness, Lady Golding, has just indicated, the report dismisses with almost cavalier economic illiteracy the Blackpool economic case. I sometimes think that if Blackpool was a steel, coal or cotton town, the impact of declining tourism would be greater appreciated. As the noble Baroness, Lady Golding, also pointed out, the Minister gives a smooth government decision-making process. I wonder what the royal commission set up to look into this matter thinks about this or what the Joint Committee thinks. The wheel has turned many times and it is unfortunate that this one has turned against Blackpool when the strongest arguments were in Blackpool’s favour. Two points really worry me. We have suddenly found that this inner city casino has the merit of being able to test social gambling—quite so. Every study at home and abroad has warned against ““door-step gambling””—gambling on the door step. Professor Crow says that, "““most of the social effects””," as would affect Blackpool, "““would be exported””." He means that people would go to places like Blackpool for two weeks for holiday enjoyment of gambling. At a door-step casino like Manchester, they will stay with the problem and will create the problem. In many ways, it is the most perverse decision that could be made and is against all the warnings of research. There is another extraordinary thing in the report. It states that, "““Manchester … is one of England’s eight ‘Core Cities’””," which drives, "““national and regional economic growth””." When and where from did the committee get this information and why were the other applicants not told that this special privilege would be given to core cities as against places like Blackpool? I should like to make one further comment to opponents of casinos. We have all watched James Bond and George Raft films and the problem with casinos is that they are a nice, emotive issue. In fact, while opponents are obsessing about casinos, the real problem gambling will go on tonight on ITV when people can spend 75p a minute on television quizzes from their beds or make bets from their telephones. The most regulated and most easily controlled problem gambling is at a destination casino. The worst kind of casino is in an inner city where problems are waiting for it and where those problems will fester.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c175-6 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Location Regulation Casino Advisory Panel
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk