Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 January 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report.


Gambling: Casino Advisory Panel Report

My Lords, perhaps I may reply to the noble Lord, Lord McNally, who deserves a response to his powerful contribution. He has been unwavering in his advocacy of Blackpool as the location and will get the opportunity for further debate on whether this recommendation should come into effect across the country. He will have the chance to make that advocacy. The noble Lord has presented the great strengths of the Blackpool case. There were great strengths among all bidders in the final group which were considered for the super-casino. Earlier, I reflected in the briefest way possible with regard to the report some factors which were considered by the casino panel. Of course, there will be disagreement with its conclusions. By definition, there would always be more disappointed towns and bidders than successful ones, which is in the nature of this kind of exercise. However, in one respect, the panel was absolutely clear: a crucial aspect of the Manchester bid was that it gave the best possible circumstances for considering problem gambling and the pilot location. That is the basis of its recommendation. We will in the future have the chance to deliberate on those points.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c176 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Location Regulation Casino Advisory Panel
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk