Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Goldsmith (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 February 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill.


Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill

moved Amendments Nos. 32 to 35: 32: Clause 9 , page 8, line 24, leave out ““An order under subsection (1)”” and insert ““A remedial order”” 33: Clause 9 , page 8, line 30, leave out ““an order under subsection (1)”” and insert ““a remedial order”” 34: Clause 9 , page 8, line 33, leave out subsection (4) and insert— ““(4) A remedial order— (a) must specify a period within which the steps referred to in subsection (1) are to be taken; (b) may require the organisation to supply to an enforcement authority consulted under subsection (3), within a specified period, evidence that those steps have been taken. A period specified under this subsection may be extended or further extended by order of the court on an application made before the end of that period or extended period.”” 35: Clause 9 , page 8, line 37, leave out ““an order under this section”” and insert ““a remedial order”” On Question, amendments agreed to. [Amendment No. 36 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c578 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Charities Armed forces Death Crown Prosecution Service Corporate manslaughter Liability Health and safety Exemptions Emergency services Police Prosecutions Negligence Scotland Training
Legislation
Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill 2005-06 to 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk