Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2007.


Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2007

I forgot to ask this. There is a report in the current edition of Personal Pensions, stating that both the Pension Protection Fund and the Pensions Regulator rule out the possibility of a merger. It quotes the Pension Protection Fund extensively as saying that it is not in favour of one, but I am not sure that that is the view of the Pensions Regulator. During the passage of the Pensions Bill, several of us argued for cost savings by merging the two bodies. Although they are both doing a good job now, there is still a good case for that. Can the Minister confirm whether the view of the Pensions Regulator really is as reported: that it does not want a merger? Obviously, I am not asking for his conclusions yet, but is that correct, because it should be seriously considered?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c88GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Compensation Costs Workplace pensions Pensions Mergers Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Pensions Regulator
Legislation
Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2006
Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2007
Occupational Pension Schemes (Levies) (Amendment) Regulations 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk