Proceeding contribution from Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 March 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2007.
Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2007
We have to look at this over a longer period. Particularly in the early years, there will be a build-up of schemes in the assessment phase and potentially then under the protection of the fund. I would imagine that there will be a convergence of the levy and the ceiling in later years as more schemes move into the fund. In the early years there is scope for a gap, but I think it would be wrong to try to close it by imposing a higher levy, taking more than is necessary in the short term. I hope that I have dealt with all the queries and accordingly I urge noble Lords to agree to these orders and regulations. On Question, Motion agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 690 c91GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Compensation Costs Workplace pensions Pensions Mergers Pension funds Pension Protection Fund Pensions Regulator
- Legislation
- Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2006
- Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2007
- Occupational Pension Schemes (Levies) (Amendment) Regulations 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:44:48 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385318
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385318
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_385318