Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Northesk (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].


Serious Crime Bill [HL]

I am grateful to the Minister for her reply; not surprisingly, I am even more grateful to my noble friend Lady Anelay for her contribution. I shall state something that is obvious and which I sought to draw out when I moved the amendment. Part of my complaint is not necessarily that the DPA does not apply properly in respect of these provisions; the fact is that the DPA is 10 years old. Ten years on, the whole IT world is a completely different kettle of fish. Part of my problem is whether the DPA of itself is robust enough to deal with this sort of provision in the current circumstances. I shall not labour the points further as it is late. I shall withdraw the amendment but, if only at the urging of my noble friend Lady Anelay, I have absolutely no doubt that we shall return to this matter on Report. For the moment, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 65 agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c1526 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Crime prevention Crime Audit Commission Fraud ICT Personal records Registration Information Commissioner's Office Information sharing
Legislation
Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk