Proceeding contribution from Lord Hylton (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 26 March 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Serious Crime Bill [HL].
Serious Crime Bill [HL]
The noble Baroness, as always, was clearly trying to be helpful. However, am I right in deducing from her reply that data-matching has been going on for a considerable number of years already, presumably on some legal basis or other? If that is the case, why are Clause 65 and Schedule 6 necessary? If I may say so, they are remarkably uninformative because they do not explain the purpose of all this activity. We have heard it confirmed that welfare fraud and tax evasion come within the scope of the measure, but I originally asked what other kinds of fraud and serious crime the Government were trying to catch.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 690 c1540
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Crime prevention Crime Audit Commission Fraud ICT Personal records Registration Information Commissioner's Office Information sharing
- Legislation
- Serious Crime Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 06:51:58 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_387972
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_387972
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_387972