Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 March 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007.


Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007

My Lords, I apologise for interrupting my noble friend but further to this very important point, which is absolutely critical to the way a number of us will vote at the end of the debate, can my noble friend clarify two things which arise out of the question from the Conservative Front Bench, and from the noble Lords, Lord McNally and Lord Glentoran? First, if we pass the amendment of my noble friend Lady Golding, is my noble friend saying that the casino licence for Manchester will still go ahead regardless of what the deliberations of the Joint Committee may be some time down the track? Is that the position? Secondly, will he also confirm that if the order is thrown out this evening, there is nothing to stop the Government bringing back a new order for the 16 licences over which there is much less controversy and then giving more time for deliberation on the regional casino licence?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
690 c1663-4 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Parliamentary scrutiny Tourism Regeneration Blackpool Merits of Statutory Instruments Committee Casino Advisory Panel
Legislation
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk