Proceeding contribution from Tony Lloyd (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 March 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Betting, Gaming and Lotteries.
Betting, Gaming and Lotteries
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way. He is being nice—but only after a time. When he said to the House on 30 January,"““I add my congratulations to Manchester . . . I and my party hope that that will bring the promised regeneration to that great city in the north-west””—[Official Report, 30 January 2007; Vol. 456, c. 89-9.]," was there any ambiguity in that statement? I can see none. With reference to his remarks this afternoon, can he tell me exactly what doubts have been cast on Manchester’s ability to deal with both regeneration and problem gambling?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 458 c1560-1
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Great Yarmouth Low incomes Regeneration Blackpool
- Legislation
- Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:20:04 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_389099
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_389099
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_389099