Proceeding contribution from Nigel Evans (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 March 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Betting, Gaming and Lotteries.
Betting, Gaming and Lotteries
One of the odd things about this debate is that the vast majority of MPs have been to Manchester and to Blackpool, and they will have made their own assessments about regeneration in both places. What struck me about the criteria was that the Government set one set of criteria, but it seems that Professor Crow and his committee acted on a different set of criteria. Had Blackpool known about that separate set of criteria, perhaps the presentation would have been somewhat different or Professor Crow would indeed have started his research by saying ““Blackpool needn’t apply.””
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 458 c1577
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Great Yarmouth Low incomes Regeneration Blackpool
- Legislation
- Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:18:57 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_389132
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_389132
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_389132