Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Nigel Evans (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 March 2007. It occurred during Legislative debate on Betting, Gaming and Lotteries.


Betting, Gaming and Lotteries

One of the odd things about this debate is that the vast majority of MPs have been to Manchester and to Blackpool, and they will have made their own assessments about regeneration in both places. What struck me about the criteria was that the Government set one set of criteria, but it seems that Professor Crow and his committee acted on a different set of criteria. Had Blackpool known about that separate set of criteria, perhaps the presentation would have been somewhat different or Professor Crow would indeed have started his research by saying ““Blackpool needn’t apply.””


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
458 c1577 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Casinos Licensing Gambling Greater Manchester Great Yarmouth Low incomes Regeneration Blackpool
Legislation
Gambling (Geographical Distribution of Casino Premises Licences) Order 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk