Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 16 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].


Legal Services Bill [HL]

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Campbell has been extremely thorough in explaining his amendment so I can be very brief in supporting it. My noble friend has drawn your Lordships’ attention to an important issue. Perhaps the best way to view the amendment is in the context of Clause 3, headed: "““The Board’s duty to promote the regulatory objectives etc””." Noble Lords will see that some but not all of what my noble friend has drawn to our attention is there. What is important in what he has said is his reference to the reasoned decision. It should be absolutely clear to all authorised persons likely to be affected by a decision that the basis for any decision made by the LSB in promoting the regulatory objectives is clearly set out in a circulated document which, as a consequence, gives any authorised person the right, if he feels he needs it, to have that decision judicially reviewed. Under the amendment, there is an obligation for the board to produce a reasoned decision, and what is perhaps more important, an obligation for that decision to be circulated in time for an authorised person, if necessary, to take legal advice and, in the last resort, to engage in litigation.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c19 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Competition Departmental responsibilities Competition Commission Legal profession Office of Fair Trading Standards Regulation Legal Services Board
Legislation
Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk