Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Parmjit Dhanda (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 18 April 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Broomhill Bank Special Needs School.


Broomhill Bank Special Needs School

I need to make a bit of progress, because a couple of contributions have curtailed the time and I want to come to some of the points about post-16 provision if I can. There is a shortage of specialist autism provision. In general, the Government welcome the development of provision to meet that shortage. It will benefit the children in the hon. Gentleman’s constituency, I am sure. We cannot dictate from Whitehall, and I do not think that anyone would want us to. To improve outcomes for children with special educational needs takes the insight and sensitivity of those familiar with the local situation and local issues. It is clear that Kent has thought long and hard about how to provide the best possible education for special needs children in the authority, and that it has ambitious plans to use capital investment —£105 million of it—to achieve its vision. I hope that the concerns of local parents and constituents can be addressed fully, and that through open dialogue, a consensus benefiting all local children can be achieved. The hon. Gentleman also made some points about post-16 provision. Were Kent to proceed with the proposal, girls with moderate learning difficulty who might previously have attended the school would be able, for example, to attend other local schools.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c138WH 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Kent Special educational needs Broomhill Bank School
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk