Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Trimble (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 23 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill.


Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, for his reference to me and our discussions in Grand Committee. However, I remain of the opinion that I expressed then: the clause is unnecessary and the Government would be well advised to leave it out. I am sorry to say that I do not see the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Lester, as particularly helpful. I suspect that it would narrow the scope for challenge rather than extend it as the noble Lord wishes. From a drafting point of view, it would be much better to insert ““lack of jurisdiction”” as an additional ground rather than take out ““exceptional circumstances””. The one good thing that can be said about the clause is the reference to exceptional circumstances, which gives the judges a door through which they can walk if they think that it is appropriate to do so.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
691 c510 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Disclosure of information Criminal records Administration of justice Inquiries Juries Intelligence services Human rights Northern Ireland Police Powers Prisons Proscribed organisations Police Service of Northern Ireland Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission Security Trials Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland Northern Ireland Department of the Director of Public Prosecutions
Legislation
Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk