Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 8 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Services Bill [HL].
Legal Services Bill [HL]
My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness but does she not agree with me that there is an inconsistency in what she has just said to your Lordships' House? In my contention the override clause would provide clarity but in her opinion it would provide inconsistency. If that is the case, surely the current provisions in the Bill are in consistent. How is it that an override clause, which in the noble Baroness’s submission exactly reflects the balance that is in the Bill, can do something different from the balance that is in the Bill?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 691 c1333-4
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Cost effectiveness Costs Legal profession Finance Fees and charges Law Society Standards Regulation Financial Reporting Council Legal Services Board Office for Legal Complaints
- Legislation
- Legal Services Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:25:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_395103
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_395103
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_395103