Proceeding contribution from Michael Fabricant (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill
I am following my hon. Friend’s logic with considerable interest. Does he understand whether the proposal might involve a two-way street? I am not clear about that; perhaps the Minister will clarify the point when she winds up the debate. If the boundary committee decides that a one-member ward is a good idea and that goes ahead, but for one reason or another it does not work as well as expected, will it be possible to make a similar application after five or six years, saying, for example, ““Okay, it hasn’t worked. Let’s go back to a two or three-member ward””?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 460 c1141-2
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Complaints Councillors Administration Elections Electoral Commission Exemptions Local government Wales Trusts Local Government Ombudsman Local Government Boundary Commission for England Standards Board for England
- Legislation
- Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:18:01 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_398775
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_398775
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_398775