Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Michael Fabricant (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 22 May 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill.


Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill

This argument is interesting to me, because I do not come from a local government background. Would my hon. Friend care to speculate on why, given the fallow year that has been mentioned, the option of quarters was not discussed? Perhaps the Minister could explain that when he winds up. If the argument is that it is helpful to have elections every year, why have elections for three years and then in a final, fourth year have no election at all? Given that halves are an option used by seven district councils, why not have the option of quarters too?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
460 c1173 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Complaints Councillors Administration Elections Electoral Commission Exemptions Local government Wales Trusts Local Government Ombudsman Local Government Boundary Commission for England Standards Board for England
Legislation
Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk