Proceeding contribution from Lord Lansley (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 23 May 2007. It occurred during Opposition day on Secretary of State for Health.
Secretary of State for Health
I beg to move,"That the salary of the Secretary of State for Health should be reduced by £1,000." The purpose of the motion is to force the resignation of the Secretary of State. I am sorry that it has come to that. Members on both sides of the House will know that we have frequently used the time available to the official Opposition in the House to raise a series of NHS and health-related issues. We have done so on health care-acquired infections, mental health, the NHS work force and planning, and the management of the health service, always on the basis of motions that are constructive and designed to support the national health service. However, NHS staff have reached the end of the line with the Secretary of State. Serial incompetence and a chronic failure to listen to those staff mean that she has no credibility left to resolve the imminent problems facing the national health service. It is not simply that she and the rest of the Government are paralysed by the non-election campaign of the right hon. Member for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath (Mr. Brown). The fact is that even were she to remain as Secretary of State after a change in prime ministership, she cannot command the necessary confidence and support across the national health service. Many Members will recall the matters that we have raised before. Let me reiterate the many serial failures for which the Secretary of State has been responsible over the past two years. In 2005, there was the botched reorganisation of primary care trusts, which led within months to the resignation of Nigel Crisp, now Lord Crisp, as chief executive of the NHS. Under this Secretary of State, we saw the NHS plunge into its largest ever deficit. Since May 2005, the number of staff—[Interruption.] Labour Members are always telling us—the Prime Minister did it again at Prime Minister’s questions today—how many additional staff have been recruited by the Labour Government. Of course, those include 107,000 administrators. When the Prime Minister says, ““There have been 250,000 extra staff””, funnily enough he never goes on to say, ““of whom 107,000 were administrators.”” However, we are focusing on the record of the Secretary of State. Since May 2005, the number of staff working in the national health service has fallen. Payment by results and the tariff—a critical element of NHS reform—collapsed in February 2006, weeks before the start of the financial year in which the NHS plunged into its largest ever deficit. In payment by results and the tariff, we have a system that is necessary but is not being delivered successfully. [Interruption.] The Minister for the Cabinet Office says, ““Ah!”” as if it is some kind of mystery. ““Money follows the patient”” was a policy advocated by the last Conservative Government; it took years for the Labour Government to get round to recognising it, exactly as happened with GP fundholding and market mechanisms inside the NHS.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 460 c1347-8
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Health NHS Ministers Department of Health Hewitt, Patricia
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:35:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399390
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399390
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_399390