Proceeding contribution from Julian Brazier (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 June 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Territorial Army.
Territorial Army
I should like to make a point before the Minister moves on from discussing the future Army structure. The macro-reorganisation that he described—the new intelligence battalion and the pairing with regular units—is fine. However, he has not addressed the problem at the level of the individual company and yeomanry squadron. We can call a structure that consists of a single rifle platoon and a huge support weapons set-up at each TA centre a company, but it will not have a critical mass for the worthwhile training of officers. If a group goes off with its regular-service counterparts to Afghanistan or Iraq—there will not be another deployment of that sort to Iraq—but never go as formed companies, no TA officer will get an opportunity to command in the field. If TA officers are stripped of opportunities to train properly at home and command abroad, it is difficult to see how the desperate shortages of such officers will not worsen.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 461 c234WH
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Armed forces Deployment Reserve forces Territorial Army
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:59:03 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_402564
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_402564
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_402564