Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 June 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2007.


Social Security, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2007

My Lords, that is a different point. Commissioner Rowland saw the possibility of getting an easement in a different area of the territory. That was identifying the synergy and was entirely positive. It is obvious that the Government think differently, and that is fine. There is a dispute not about the facts but about the consequences and whether we are walking away from an opportunity to make the claims of those who come from furth of the United Kingdom easier in terms of the habitual residence test. History will show whether the Minister is right or we on this side of the House are right. We have had a good discussion. I understand the position but I am not persuaded. I do not think it would do the House any service at this stage to do anything other than to withdrawthe Motion. I therefore beg leave to withdraw the Motion. Motion, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
693 c86 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Council tax benefits Housing benefit Social security benefits
Legislation
Social Security Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk