Proceeding contribution from Baroness Greengross (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 4 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
My Lords, I support the amendment. It relates to the principle that we have in this country, and which I think we all accept, that no Government can make decisions that cannot be reversed by a future Government. I congratulate the Government on taking a much longer-term view than is usually the case. The amendment seems to be about prudence, with all that that implies, keeping in line with the recommendations of the Turner report and looking towards the long term. We cannot tell now what view a future Government might take on residency being the criterion for receiving a state pension. The amendment is a simple way of ensuring that that it is possible should a Government wish to do it.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 693 c1055
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Carers Age Women Employment Electoral register Increases Discrimination Guaranteed minimum pensions Parents Workplace pensions Pensions Public sector National insurance contributions Rebates Older workers Overseas residence State retirement pensions Training Rural areas Retirement Widowed people Life expectancy
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:06:11 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408054
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408054
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_408054