Proceeding contribution from Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 11 July 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Pensions Bill.
Pensions Bill
My Lords, I have one small point to add to the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, about delegated legislation. One of the many benefits of post-legislative scrutiny of the Bill would be that it would enable Parliament, practitioners and the public to know which parts of the Bill have been triggered by the appropriate delegated legislation and which have not, and whether there is any timescale in which the rest of it may be triggered. Clause 36, for example, deals with orders and regulations. Subsection (3) says: "““Before the Secretary of State makes any regulations by virtue of … section 15(5), or … section 18(9), he must consult such persons as he considers appropriate””." How do we know when these regulations will be made? That is one virtue of post-legislative scrutiny which is not brought out enough. People think that all parts of a Bill come into force at the same time once it is enacted, which is very far from the case.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 693 c1417
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Age Legislation Pensions Parliamentary scrutiny State retirement pensions Uprating State earnings related pension scheme National employment savings trust scheme
- Legislation
- Pensions Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-01-13 13:00:34 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_409868
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_409868
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_409868