Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Bridgeman (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 17 July 2007. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Investigation of Protected Electronic Information: Code of Practice) Order 2007.


Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Investigation of Protected Electronic Information: Code of Practice) Order 2007

I am grateful to the Minister for that comprehensive explanation of the two orders, and the remarks with which he finished about the increasing sophistication of terrorists and of the criminal fraternity in general. I am pleased to hear that there was extensive consultation on both orders, and we welcome the safeguards provided under both the codes: first, the Interception of Communications Commissioner and, then, a further appeal to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. In the second order the controls on public authorities to ensure that the use of the powers is undertaken appropriately and in compliance with the requirements and principles of Part 3 and the code of practice are, again, reassuring. I am grateful to the Minister for recognising the question of the burden of proof, on which we are reassured. We have no objections to either order.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
694 c6GC 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Disclosure of information Data protection Codes of practice Crime Computer networks Data transmission Financial services Internet Telecommunications
Legislation
Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Investigation of Protected Electronic Information: Code of Practice) Order 2007
Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Acquisition and Disclosure of Communications Data: Code of Practice) Order 2007
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk