Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Lazarowicz (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 July 2007. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Draft Legislative Programme.


Draft Legislative Programme

I, too, welcome the fact that we are having this debate on the Government’s draft programme, not just because it gives Back-Bench MPs and even the tiniest of minority Opposition parties a chance to comment on the Government’s proposals, but also because, as we have heard, it allows the public to be involved in the process. My right hon. and learned Friend the Leader of the House will understand from my earlier intervention how keen I am to ensure that consultation takes place in all the nations of the UK. The announcement of the draft programme is also welcome because it deals with one of the most striking anomalies in our constitution, whereby every year the monarch is made to read a speech that she has not written, and with which she may disagree heartily, and has to pretend that it is her programme, which she is bringing as a surprise to Parliament. We all know that is not the reality, so the announcement of the draft programme makes it clear that political responsibility for the programme lies with the Government, while recognising the monarch’s role as Head of State in the formal ceremony. It is a welcome element of modernisation in our proceedings at Westminster. I shall speak briefly about four specific aspects of the measures outlined in the draft programme. I hope the Government will take my comments on board. The first issue is housing, on which the draft programme makes a number of legislative proposals, reflecting the commitment made by the new Prime Minister to meet housing need, especially for first-time buyers. That is particularly important in many parts of the country, not least in my constituency. Housing legislation is, as it should be, devolved to the Scottish Parliament, but decisions at UK level can have as important an impact on housing provision in Scotland as in England or Wales. If changes were made to VAT and stamp duty—I have no idea whether that is in anyone’s mind—such matters would certainly be decided at UK level. The Government’s welcome proposals to encourage more long-term fixed-rate mortgages would benefit house buyers in all parts of the UK. Similarly, the proposals to make Government land available for housing also have relevance for Scotland, particularly given the opportunities for the development of Ministry of Defence property.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
463 c984-5 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Legislative process Public bills Parliamentary scrutiny Government bills
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk