Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Andrews (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 October 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.


Greater London Authority Bill

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 1 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 1A. It was the overwhelming view of the other place that it would be wrong to impose term limits on the office of London Mayor. This country has no tradition of term limits. The principle that sits at the heart of elected public office at all levels in this country is that it should be the electorate who decides who represents them. In the GLA elections next May, Londoners are looking forward to a robust contest between Ken Livingstone, Boris Johnson and whoever the Liberal Democrats choose as their candidate. But the current Mayor would be disqualified from standing were this amendment to stand part of the Bill. It is obviously right for the London electorate to choose who should be London’s Mayor. Term limits have no place in the vibrancy of British political life. Moved, That the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 1 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 1A.—(Baroness Andrews.)


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
695 c651 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Candidates Finance Elections Eligibility Greater London Greater London Authority Functions Local government Mayor of London London Assembly
Legislation
Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk