Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 November 2007. It occurred during Debate on Conventional Weapons.
Conventional Weapons
My Lords, we keep on referring to ““dumb””. My noble friend advanced a possible definition of what is not dumb: something that has either self-destruct or deactivation. The third category is weapons that are steered to individual targets. The general thinking is that either of those qualifications makes a munition not dumb. Does the Minister accept that if both of them were incorporated, a very large number would be put out of service and that would be an enormous step forward?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 696 c602-3
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Casualties Civilians Arms control Cluster munitions Bomb disposal EU action Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-25 10:50:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_422456
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_422456
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_422456